Performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef cattle managed in a bedded hoop-barn system.

نویسندگان

  • M S Honeyman
  • W D Busby
  • S M Lonergan
  • A K Johnson
  • D L Maxwell
  • J D Harmon
  • S C Shouse
چکیده

The use of bedded hoop barns in finishing systems for beef cattle has not been widely researched. In this management system, beef cattle are confined to hoop barns throughout finishing, and bedding is used to absorb animal waste, which results in minimal effluent. The objective of this study was to compare the performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers (n = 1,428) managed in a bedded hoop-barn management system vs. an open-feedlot system with shelter. Six feeding trials were conducted over a 3-yr period. Three trials were conducted during summer-fall and 3 trials were conducted during winter-spring. Crossbred steers were allotted to 3 pens in the hoop-barn system and to 3 pens in the open-lot system (approximately 40 steers per pen in both facility systems). Stocking densities for the steers were 4.65 m(2) per steer in the hoop-barn system and 14.7 m(2) per steer in the open-lot system. The steers were begun on trial weighing 410 and 411 kg (SD = 21), were fed for 102.3 and 103.0 d (SD = 3.8), and were weighed off test at 595 and 602 kg (SD = 21) for the hoop-barn and open-lot systems, respectively. Steer performance measures consisted of ADG, DMI, and G:F. Carcass characteristics were HCW, fat thickness, LM area, KPH percentage, marbling score, USDA yield grade, and USDA quality grade. No year, season, or pen (management system) main effects, or season x management system and year x management system interactions were observed for any of the items measured related to cattle performance or carcass characteristics (P > 0.05). Final mud scores (a subjective evaluation of the amount of soil and manure adhering to the hair coat of the animals) were greater for the steers from the open-lot system compared with those from the hoop-barn system (P < 0.02), suggesting steers in the hoop-barn system carried less mud than steers from the open-lot system. Average daily cornstalk bedding use in the hoop-barn system was 2.3 kg/steer during summer-fall and 2.6 kg/steer during winter-spring. The performance of finishing cattle managed in a hoop-barn system was not different from the performance of cattle managed in an open-feedlot system with shelter during summer and winter. Managing beef cattle in hoop barns required more bedding but resulted in decreased mud scores compared with cattle managed in an open-lot system with shelter. Hoop barns are a viable alternative housing management system for finishing beef cattle.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparison of steer behavior when housed in a deep-bedded hoop barn versus an open feedlot with shelter.

The use of hoop barns as an alternative housing system for beef cattle has not been widely researched. The objectives of this study were to determine the main effects of behavior of steers 1) over winter and summer, 2) when housed in either a hoop barn or a conventional feedlot, and 3) interactions between season and housing system. A total of 960 crossbred Bos taurus steers were used [August 2...

متن کامل

Extensive bedded indoor and outdoor pig production systems in USA: current trends and effects on animal care and product quality

The objective of this review paper is to document extensive bedded indoor and outdoor pig production in the United States, which has expanded due to growing niche markets for natural and organic pork. Bedded hoop (tentlike) barns are used for finishing pigs and gestating sows. Seasonal outdoor farrowing and some indoor bedded farrowing systems coupled with group lactation are used also. Most na...

متن کامل

Effects of Programmed Feeding to a Constant Average Daily Gain vs. Ad Libitum Feed Intake on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing Beef Steers

Thirty-two Angus steers were used in a 140d feeding trial to examine the effects of ad libitum feed intake or a programmed rate of gain on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics. Ad libitum-fed steers had greater (P < .06) DMI, ADG, and feed efficiency from d 0 to 28, 0 to 56, and 0 to 84 than programmed-fed steers; however, no differences in ADG, DMI, or feed efficiency were detected ...

متن کامل

Effects of Franklin Feed-Grade Limestone vs. Aerion Industries Nutrion Limestone on performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers

Because grains comprise the major portion of diets for finishing beef cattle, and grains contain little calcium, limestone is typically added to finishing diets at levels of .7 to more than 1% of the dry matter. Feedgrade limestone varies in quality and consistency, which could alter performance responses by finishing beef steers. Selection of superior sources of limestone and(or) treatment of ...

متن کامل

Effects of Feed Additives and Body Weight on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Beef Finishing Cattle

........................................................................................................................ 44 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 45 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................. 46 Results and Discu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of animal science

دوره 88 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010